You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:02 pm Post subject: intellectual take on adam and eve
many theologists (the ones who study at seminaries etc) do not take the 'adam and eve' story to be a literal one. should they be teaching it as a 'story'/''tale' with a moral as opposed to what literally happened?
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: intellectual take on adam and eve
drax wrote:
many theologists (the ones who study at seminaries etc) do not take the 'adam and eve' story to be a literal one. should they be teaching it as a 'story'/''tale' with a moral as opposed to what literally happened?
But i dont understand this...if they dont take it literal then they obviously dont believe in the creation story and what kinda theologist would they be if they dont believe in that.
jesus spoke in parables, so its obvious that people related to the God Head are good at parables, it is not far fetched that Adam and Eve could be a parable; a potent metaphor.
jesus spoke in parables, so its obvious that people related to the God Head are good at parables, it is not far fetched that Adam and Eve could be a parable; a potent metaphor.
It is far fetched because remember Adam and Eve were supposed to be the first man/woman of the earth and it's thru them that the world populated---so turn that into a metaphor and how would they explain how the world populated? and how would they explain their children, caine, abel etc and what about their descendants abraham, david even jesus?
jesus spoke in parables, so its obvious that people related to the God Head are good at parables, it is not far fetched that Adam and Eve could be a parable; a potent metaphor.
It is far fetched because remember Adam and Eve were supposed to be the first man/woman of the earth and it's thru them that the world populated---so turn that into a metaphor and how would they explain how the world populated? and how would they explain their children, caine, abel etc and what about their descendants abraham, david even jesus?
simple, early man (and women) were more innocent than we are now (born naked), their lives revolved around living off the land as ours is now just much more simply (eating stuff in the garden of eden), from the beginning of time men and women have had conflicts because of their differing characteristics (the episode of the fruit) and so on and so on.
jesus spoke in parables, so its obvious that people related to the God Head are good at parables, it is not far fetched that Adam and Eve could be a parable; a potent metaphor.
It is far fetched because remember Adam and Eve were supposed to be the first man/woman of the earth and it's thru them that the world populated---so turn that into a metaphor and how would they explain how the world populated? and how would they explain their children, caine, abel etc and what about their descendants abraham, david even jesus?
simple, early man (and women) were more innocent than we are now (born naked), their lives revolved around living off the land as ours is now just much more simply (eating stuff in the garden of eden), from the beginning of time men and women have had conflicts because of their differing characteristics (the episode of the fruit) and so on and so on.
Lol, sound like you have that all planned out ....But in order for the creation story to be true there had to be one man and woman to start...so why could'nt it be Adam and Eve?...If there was just "men and women" then who was the first man/woman?
jesus spoke in parables, so its obvious that people related to the God Head are good at parables, it is not far fetched that Adam and Eve could be a parable; a potent metaphor.
It is far fetched because remember Adam and Eve were supposed to be the first man/woman of the earth and it's thru them that the world populated---so turn that into a metaphor and how would they explain how the world populated? and how would they explain their children, caine, abel etc and what about their descendants abraham, david even jesus?
simple, early man (and women) were more innocent than we are now (born naked), their lives revolved around living off the land as ours is now just much more simply (eating stuff in the garden of eden), from the beginning of time men and women have had conflicts because of their differing characteristics (the episode of the fruit) and so on and so on.
Lol, sound like you have that all planned out ....But in order for the creation story to be true there had to be one man and woman to start...so why could'nt it be Adam and Eve?...If there was just "men and women" then who was the first man/woman?
theoretically the 'first' man and woman could, um, lets called them 'Adam' and 'Eve', lived in a far away land called, um, lets say 'Garden of Eden' (which by the way now symbolizes perfection and happiness) and so on. It does not have to be a literal account of what happened.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Calendar
....But in order for the creation story to be true there had to be one man and woman to start...so why could'nt it be Adam and Eve?...If there was just "men and women" then who was the first man/woman?